only the large accounts believed substack and/or twitter were 'free speech platforms' (because to censor them would make the truth known). we small-fries were made aware of the censorship pretty quickly and regularly, but I figured it would reach 'the top,' eventually.
Escape Key seems to show that over six million pages of largely real information covering a number of years in the Epstein file has been curated to give the impression of exposing the construction a population control system , while today, the system itself ticks quietly in the background like a Swiss watch.
One important finding is that knowledge is acceptable, comprehension is not. How can the 17 UN sustainable development goals possibly be questioned when they are going to save the planet and safeguarding children from inappropriate content on the internet not be due diligence. Escape Key explains clearly the nature of the digital control grid, but the way it is to be locked must remain a mystery.
While Epstein was deftly curated by omission and a few red herrings, Substack is different, because The CHD, Sasha Latypova, Catherine Austin Fitts and many other fearless researchers have laid bare, in the digital and real worlds, the mechanism for a biological attack on humanity, and Katherine Watt has irrefutably documented the building, brick by brick, over centuries, of a legal wall to protect it.
This clear understanding of the system must now be contained by the big tech owners of Substack, seemingly, by technical glitches and ID verification.
Wayback archive doesn't work on my Substack stories anymore either - I have found since Australia's social media age verification laws came in that I can no longer archive my work. I noticed it around that time, it might have been a problem earlier I'm not sure. Attempts to save a story save only the home page listing of stories instead.
"Labor for all, the opening of Credit for all; Leisure for all will be our bogie for the illusory creation of a new social class: the "Middle Class". Because once our objectives are reached, the "Class" in the middle, between the secular poor, and we the rich, we will definitely remove by cutting off all means of survival."
"Thus it will be possible to sharply increase the burden of the State by multiplying without any limit a body of intellectual public servants. Insured for years in advance of material security, they will be consequently perfect for executors of "Government Authority", in other words of "Our Power".
"Thus creating an impressive body of officials who will in itself (a Government within the Government), irrespective of the political party that is in power. This anonymous machine can serve us one day means of leverages when the moment comes to accelerate the economic collapse of the Nation States, because these will not be able to indefinitely sustain such mass salaries without having going into debt beyond their means."
The Toronto Protocols of the Canadian Freemasons. 1995
Possibly and highly probable that 'interference' comes from the subject matter with AI scouring the data at faster-than-light-speed looking for 'flags' so it can mess with the host site one way or another... this is happening across the board as the powers-that-ought-not-be want any 'harmful content' (to them) disappeared from view
"trust us, we're from the government and we're here to help"
Substack is compromised, without a doubt, which is too bad. Starting to see lots of liberal bots on here, and have the same people 3 times a day or more wanting to follow me....ya right.
If this is true, then really the only value that Substack brings to the table, freedom to write whatever you want and let the readers decide for themselves, freedom from censorship ... is gone. I used to call it the Substack Underground because that was the only place you could write free from the Biden Nazi censorship. If Substack has gone the way of all the other Social Media Platforms, that is to say their policy changes as the political winds blow another way, they will not be around long.
Well, well. Substack isn't the only one censoring Substack. Since 2023, X has been shadowbanning and censoring Substack. That is why I had to launch my own website just to share articles on X.
We checked this out and think the issue is just our confusing UI. It seems like you’re clicking the “Share” icon, when the option is actually in the three-dot icon menu. There’s definitely nothing blocking this on our end, in any event, except too many buttons!
Actually I STILL got this wrong, it’s the Share button instead of the Share dropdown menu 😭 (we have got to clean all this up); but the headline is there’s no block on this, just bad design.
I only have over 200 subscribers and my account is shadow banned. I used to be able to google my newsletter and it would come up in searches but over a year ago, something changed - maybe censorship using AI? Crazy that there isn’t really free speech anywhere.
You think the search engines are bad, wait until AI recognizes your work. About a month or two back, I was tickled pink 'co-pilot' even acknowledged me. And this is with Bing for the most part, like you, never displaying search results of my posts when queried. But when I saw what co-pilot did, I couldn't believe it. It flat-out lied and misled what my post was all about. It made up its own biased narrative and put my name to it. And the reference they listed, wasn't even my work. They didn't even post a link to my article. So you haven't seen anything yet. I plan on doing substack on this incredible AI behavior. I have the screenshots. It was this article that they twisted and misrepresented...
To be completely transparent, not all search engines and AI have done this. Google for some strange reason, does post my articles in its search results. Which wasn't always the case. But it seems now to be behaving like a search engine,... at least for me and most of my work that isn't bucking the narrative too much. Although their AI mode is very erratic. But shockingly, in Google's AI pro mode,.. it actually came up with a pretty good summary....
"The Substack post "The Incredible Evil in Suppressing Vitamin D" by ohbaby alleges that public health authorities have knowingly maintained dangerously low Vitamin D recommendations due to a past statistical calculation error. It argues that this deficiency is a form of negligence linked to poor outcomes, including those during the COVID-19 pandemic, and advocates for significantly higher daily intake levels. You can read the full article on ohbaby's Substack."
I tried 'pro mode' again and got another slightly different version, but still good....
"The Substack post "The Incredible Evil in Suppressing Vitamin D" by ohbaby alleges that public health authorities intentionally set Vitamin D recommended dietary allowances (RDA) too low based on a 2010 statistical error, sacrificing population health for pharmaceutical profits. The author argues that higher daily doses, rather than the standard 600 IU, are necessary for sufficient blood levels and claims this suppression directly caused preventable illness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Read the full post on ohbaby's Substack."
This has happened to other folks as well. Dr Meryl Nass recently reported this happening to her. Well, to be honest, didn't we already know this was going to happen with Substack eventually?
I still foresee a time when we will be going back to print media, pamphlets, etc. Which, isn't all bad. I owe my awakening decades ago to pamphlets I would find on gas pumps and in laundry mats.
Christianity was spread by word of mouth and, at one time, became the largest religion on the planet.
Not all is lost as we endure this insanity and stay one step ahead of those who really think a world where only approved narratives are available will be a world worth living in. Three words: It won't be.
Without the ability to have discourse, we might as well be farm animals. Every one of us living in our 200 sq foot coffin apartment in our "freedom" city and waiting to die as we eat what we are told to eat, take the medicine we are told to take, and watch what we are told to watch.
It's long past time for *everyone* to stop allowing what someone else says to hurt their feelers or "trigger" them. Who cares if it does? Seriously? Are we forced to read, watch, or listen to things that stress us out? I haven't found anything yet that I can't either turn off, turn the channel, or unsubscribe from. We have absolute control over what media we consume. These platforms are criminal. And, seriously, these platforms doing all of the censoring... how are they going to make money when eventually, if they keep doing this sort of thing, are shut down by their masters as well? Man, these people are just not thinking ahead at all.
"I still foresee a time when we will be going back to print media, pamphlets, etc. Which, isn't all bad. I owe my awakening decades ago to pamphlets I would find on gas pumps and in laundry mats."
I see a new dark age emerging in the future. There is proof that advanced civilizations have existed and then disappeared.
Flashlights and Sasha Latypova, thank you for the invitation! I have 15 subscribers and this cross-posted fine. Too bad some pharmaceuticals aren't so keen on independent experiments.
only the large accounts believed substack and/or twitter were 'free speech platforms' (because to censor them would make the truth known). we small-fries were made aware of the censorship pretty quickly and regularly, but I figured it would reach 'the top,' eventually.
Escape Key seems to show that over six million pages of largely real information covering a number of years in the Epstein file has been curated to give the impression of exposing the construction a population control system , while today, the system itself ticks quietly in the background like a Swiss watch.
One important finding is that knowledge is acceptable, comprehension is not. How can the 17 UN sustainable development goals possibly be questioned when they are going to save the planet and safeguarding children from inappropriate content on the internet not be due diligence. Escape Key explains clearly the nature of the digital control grid, but the way it is to be locked must remain a mystery.
While Epstein was deftly curated by omission and a few red herrings, Substack is different, because The CHD, Sasha Latypova, Catherine Austin Fitts and many other fearless researchers have laid bare, in the digital and real worlds, the mechanism for a biological attack on humanity, and Katherine Watt has irrefutably documented the building, brick by brick, over centuries, of a legal wall to protect it.
This clear understanding of the system must now be contained by the big tech owners of Substack, seemingly, by technical glitches and ID verification.
https://badprotein.substack.com/p/how-we-know-viruses-are-real
I didnt read it all.I believe you
Wayback archive doesn't work on my Substack stories anymore either - I have found since Australia's social media age verification laws came in that I can no longer archive my work. I noticed it around that time, it might have been a problem earlier I'm not sure. Attempts to save a story save only the home page listing of stories instead.
"Labor for all, the opening of Credit for all; Leisure for all will be our bogie for the illusory creation of a new social class: the "Middle Class". Because once our objectives are reached, the "Class" in the middle, between the secular poor, and we the rich, we will definitely remove by cutting off all means of survival."
"Thus it will be possible to sharply increase the burden of the State by multiplying without any limit a body of intellectual public servants. Insured for years in advance of material security, they will be consequently perfect for executors of "Government Authority", in other words of "Our Power".
"Thus creating an impressive body of officials who will in itself (a Government within the Government), irrespective of the political party that is in power. This anonymous machine can serve us one day means of leverages when the moment comes to accelerate the economic collapse of the Nation States, because these will not be able to indefinitely sustain such mass salaries without having going into debt beyond their means."
The Toronto Protocols of the Canadian Freemasons. 1995
Possibly and highly probable that 'interference' comes from the subject matter with AI scouring the data at faster-than-light-speed looking for 'flags' so it can mess with the host site one way or another... this is happening across the board as the powers-that-ought-not-be want any 'harmful content' (to them) disappeared from view
"trust us, we're from the government and we're here to help"
Nothing new here and well identified. X-posting appears frequently used by SS algorithm to obstruct dissemination.
Arguably de rigueur for SS that also shadow bans?
May be. Presumed until proved otherwise.
Relatively easy to circumvent.
Copy and paste the desired post, and then repost under a brief introductory preamble.
Substack is compromised, without a doubt, which is too bad. Starting to see lots of liberal bots on here, and have the same people 3 times a day or more wanting to follow me....ya right.
If this is true, then really the only value that Substack brings to the table, freedom to write whatever you want and let the readers decide for themselves, freedom from censorship ... is gone. I used to call it the Substack Underground because that was the only place you could write free from the Biden Nazi censorship. If Substack has gone the way of all the other Social Media Platforms, that is to say their policy changes as the political winds blow another way, they will not be around long.
Well, well. Substack isn't the only one censoring Substack. Since 2023, X has been shadowbanning and censoring Substack. That is why I had to launch my own website just to share articles on X.
We checked this out and think the issue is just our confusing UI. It seems like you’re clicking the “Share” icon, when the option is actually in the three-dot icon menu. There’s definitely nothing blocking this on our end, in any event, except too many buttons!
Actually I STILL got this wrong, it’s the Share button instead of the Share dropdown menu 😭 (we have got to clean all this up); but the headline is there’s no block on this, just bad design.
After Googlie YouTube, Meta, et al, it is easy for people to conclude that access failure is intentional.
I wonder most about the recommendation issue with Barry Young story in this article.
SubStack is international and has to deal with the severe censorship in other countries like the one that put him in prison.
I wonder (and have NO IDEA if it makes sense) if it is "censorship" or some glitch in their system to prevent plagiarism (which may not take place).
I only have over 200 subscribers and my account is shadow banned. I used to be able to google my newsletter and it would come up in searches but over a year ago, something changed - maybe censorship using AI? Crazy that there isn’t really free speech anywhere.
You think the search engines are bad, wait until AI recognizes your work. About a month or two back, I was tickled pink 'co-pilot' even acknowledged me. And this is with Bing for the most part, like you, never displaying search results of my posts when queried. But when I saw what co-pilot did, I couldn't believe it. It flat-out lied and misled what my post was all about. It made up its own biased narrative and put my name to it. And the reference they listed, wasn't even my work. They didn't even post a link to my article. So you haven't seen anything yet. I plan on doing substack on this incredible AI behavior. I have the screenshots. It was this article that they twisted and misrepresented...
The Incredible Evil in Suppressing Vitamin D
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/the-incredible-evil-in-suppressing
Oh no! 😟 I didn’t even think about this…that’s awful. Now AI is smearing you!
To be completely transparent, not all search engines and AI have done this. Google for some strange reason, does post my articles in its search results. Which wasn't always the case. But it seems now to be behaving like a search engine,... at least for me and most of my work that isn't bucking the narrative too much. Although their AI mode is very erratic. But shockingly, in Google's AI pro mode,.. it actually came up with a pretty good summary....
"The Substack post "The Incredible Evil in Suppressing Vitamin D" by ohbaby alleges that public health authorities have knowingly maintained dangerously low Vitamin D recommendations due to a past statistical calculation error. It argues that this deficiency is a form of negligence linked to poor outcomes, including those during the COVID-19 pandemic, and advocates for significantly higher daily intake levels. You can read the full article on ohbaby's Substack."
I tried 'pro mode' again and got another slightly different version, but still good....
"The Substack post "The Incredible Evil in Suppressing Vitamin D" by ohbaby alleges that public health authorities intentionally set Vitamin D recommended dietary allowances (RDA) too low based on a 2010 statistical error, sacrificing population health for pharmaceutical profits. The author argues that higher daily doses, rather than the standard 600 IU, are necessary for sufficient blood levels and claims this suppression directly caused preventable illness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Read the full post on ohbaby's Substack."
I also noticed some strange things happening when I passed the two hundred mark.
This has happened to other folks as well. Dr Meryl Nass recently reported this happening to her. Well, to be honest, didn't we already know this was going to happen with Substack eventually?
I still foresee a time when we will be going back to print media, pamphlets, etc. Which, isn't all bad. I owe my awakening decades ago to pamphlets I would find on gas pumps and in laundry mats.
Christianity was spread by word of mouth and, at one time, became the largest religion on the planet.
Not all is lost as we endure this insanity and stay one step ahead of those who really think a world where only approved narratives are available will be a world worth living in. Three words: It won't be.
Without the ability to have discourse, we might as well be farm animals. Every one of us living in our 200 sq foot coffin apartment in our "freedom" city and waiting to die as we eat what we are told to eat, take the medicine we are told to take, and watch what we are told to watch.
It's long past time for *everyone* to stop allowing what someone else says to hurt their feelers or "trigger" them. Who cares if it does? Seriously? Are we forced to read, watch, or listen to things that stress us out? I haven't found anything yet that I can't either turn off, turn the channel, or unsubscribe from. We have absolute control over what media we consume. These platforms are criminal. And, seriously, these platforms doing all of the censoring... how are they going to make money when eventually, if they keep doing this sort of thing, are shut down by their masters as well? Man, these people are just not thinking ahead at all.
"I still foresee a time when we will be going back to print media, pamphlets, etc. Which, isn't all bad. I owe my awakening decades ago to pamphlets I would find on gas pumps and in laundry mats."
I see a new dark age emerging in the future. There is proof that advanced civilizations have existed and then disappeared.
Flashlights and Sasha Latypova, thank you for the invitation! I have 15 subscribers and this cross-posted fine. Too bad some pharmaceuticals aren't so keen on independent experiments.